[ad_1]
Taylor Leighton is an affiliate at Akin Gump, working within the company restructuring division however he’s utilizing his authorized acumen for one thing decidedly extra private. He’s filed a lawsuit in New York State Courtroom in opposition to his ex — Winson & Strawn litigation affiliate Nathan Greess — over the possession of their mini poodle, Raven. (Sure, named after Raven-Symoné, per the court docket submitting, “I selected the title Raven as a result of she was black in coloration just like the chook and since my favourite actor as a toddler was Raven-Symoné from Disney Channel’s That’s So Raven.”)
Within the submitting, Leighton speaks passionately about his love for the canine.
“Raven is greater than a canine to me. I contemplate her to be my baby. As an illustration to this Courtroom of my love for Raven, I deliberate an extravagant first party for her within the condo. I spent a number of days planning and adorning, together with blowing up a whole bunch of balloons and putting decals on the wall to present Raven a big day. Defendant, after all, participated within the festivities nevertheless it was me who took the lead on all planning and implementation.”
Leighton accuses Greess of dognapping Raven and refusing to let Leighton see the canine. He argues Greess is utilizing the canine as a instrument to particularly damage Leighton, “Whereas I imagine I’ve approached this case from a place of affection for Raven, Defendant has used her to harm me. I don’t imagine he’s performing out of affection for her. I do know it’s in Raven’s finest pursuits to be with me. I can help her financially and supply her with a loving and nurturing setting. She ought to come again residence.”
In consequence, Leighton is looking for $100,000 for intentional infliction of emotional misery, $100,000 for negligent infliction of emotional misery, a further $7,791 for the acquisition of Raven and the price of her care, and lawyer’s charges.
Greess’s lawyer Emily Pollock told The Daily Beast, “Mr. Greess has not been served with any submitting regarding his canine, Raven, and doesn’t want to litigate this private matter within the media. However he strongly disputes that Mr. Leighton has superior possessory or possession rights to Raven or that it could be finest for Raven to stay with Mr. Leighton as an alternative of Mr. Greess, significantly in gentle of Mr. Leighton’s conduct all through the events’ relationship. Ought to Mr. Leighton pursue his claims, we’re assured that Mr. Greess will prevail and Raven will stay with him.”
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Regulation, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the perfect, so please join along with her. Be at liberty to e mail her with any suggestions, questions, or feedback and observe her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon <a href=“https://mastodon.social/
[ad_2]
Source link
