Each every so often you get a trademark bullying story that meets a simply and correct finish. Nearly a 12 months in the past, we discussed how Louis Vuitton, well-known maker of luxurious vogue merchandise and infamous trademark bully, did its bullying factor when it opposed the trademark software for an organization within the UK known as L V Bespoke. Louis Vuitton asserted that solely it may use the letters “L” and “V” in its branding and additional alleged that, as a result of it makes use of these letters on steel affixed to its luxurious gadgets, it was additional problematic on this case as a result of L V Bespoke additionally makes issues with steel. Misplaced in all of that was the easy incontrovertible fact that L V Bespoke makes gardening merchandise and that the steel it really works with are gardening assist stakes. In case you don’t imagine this entire factor was actually that silly, go learn the publish. It was.
However Louis Vuitton is huge and L V Bespoke is a tiny firm with out the authorized warchest to match its interlocutor. The founders of the corporate, from which it derives its “L V” title, are Lawrence and Victoria Osborne and it might have been extraordinarily simple for the 2 to cave to the style large’s calls for and both rebrand the corporate or shut up store. Fortuitously, that didn’t occur and the UKIPO has sided with L V Bespoke and has granted it the mark.
“It’s a good way to begin the brand new 12 months and we are able to lastly wholeheartedly embrace the branding of our enterprise. To not have the concern of getting to rebrand or rescope our enterprise is a big reduction. We’ve had the handbrake on our enterprise for the final six months awaiting this resolution, so it’s been a very long time coming,” mentioned Victoria.
That is clearly the appropriate resolution, however we additionally shouldn’t enable the truth that this went on for months and months to go with out greater than a mere shrug of our shoulders. Louis Vuitton completely knew, or ought to have identified, that this opposition was made with out even a touch of benefit. It bullied this small firm as a result of it may. I can’t consider one other clarification for the opposition. And that opposition took a really actual toll on Lawrence, Victoria, and their enterprise.
“It’s been difficult each mentally and financially. Mentally it’s been vastly difficult for us as a household not realizing whether or not or not we are able to proceed to develop our enterprise with the presence and id that we have already got,” she mentioned.
“All the things has come as an enormous reduction and I hope the subsequent six months aren’t as difficult as what the final have been awaiting this resolution so we are able to lastly transfer ahead,” she continued.
And to be clear, it wasn’t simply emotionally taxing, having to combat this nonsense. The enterprise needed to spend the dollar-equivalent of practically $20,000 to fight the opposition, whereas the ultimate resolution within the end result solely requires Louis Vuitton to reimburse L V Bespoke 1 / 4 of that in prices. In different phrases, a small enterprise needed to spend the equal of practically $15,000 out of pocket merely as a result of one of many largest and wealthiest luxurious designer manufacturers on the planet determined to make nonsensical bother.
That’s fairly shitty and attracts the plain level: there must be extra punishment for submitting completely mindless trademark oppositions akin to this.
Louis Vuitton’s Opposition To Trademark For Gardening Tools Fails Spectacularly
Extra Regulation-Associated Tales From Techdirt:
Final FCC Net Neutrality Rules Address ‘Fast Lane’ Loophole That Worried Critics
5th Circuit Appeals Court Applauds Itself For Properly Handling An Obvious Denial Of Immunity
Can ChatGPT Violate Your Privacy Rights If It Doesn’t Store Your Data?
