[ad_1]
Ed. be aware: Welcome to our every day function, Quote of the Day.
When the Nixon case was determined, I assumed that whereas it will give subsequent presidents the chance to assert government privilege, which was not a longtime doctrine, I by no means thought it will result in a former president claiming immunity from felony prosecution. But right here we’re.
— Philip Lacovara, who served as counsel to the Watergate particular prosecutor, in feedback given to the ABA Journal on why he fears that the Supreme Courtroom might develop the idea of presidential immunity for former president Donald Trump. “I’m involved that there could be at the very least some assist for him on the courtroom, and that’s indicated by how they reformulated the query, which is to ask whether or not the Structure gives immunity for actions which are allegedly throughout the scope of presidential energy,” Lacovara mentioned. “The best way they formulated the query was if the previous president alleges that he was performing as president, is there constitutional immunity? That’s essentially the most indulgent formulation for Trump’s profit. I’m fairly sure there are some justices who need to see Trump exonerated or spared from felony trial.”
Staci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Regulation, the place she’s labored since 2011. She’d love to listen to from you, so please be happy to email her with any suggestions, questions, feedback, or critiques. You may observe her on X/Twitter and Threads or join along with her on LinkedIn.
[ad_2]
Source link
