[ad_1]
At a time when authorized expertise corporations are making it simpler to entry and analyze courtroom paperwork, what ought to – and shouldn’t – be achieved to guard confidential courtroom paperwork which might be sealed from public entry?
This query got here to a head final July, when a federal courtroom in North Carolina took the drastic step of issuing a standing order that successfully banned legal professionals in that district from utilizing third-party service suppliers similar to PacerPro, RECAP or DocketBird. That order got here on the heels of a memorandum from the Administrative Workplace of the U.S. Courts that – whereas it didn’t outright ban using such service suppliers – it did urge courts to warn filers to be cautious about utilizing third-party companies and software program.
Have been these actions justified? Is there cause to be involved about third-party suppliers? And what precisely is one of the best ways to guard sealed paperwork?
To reply these questions, the authorized tech firm PacerPro introduced collectively a panel of specialists for a stay program offered through the annual assembly of the National Docketing Association in Boston in October. On the panel had been:
I moderated the panel and recorded it for this podcast. Due to the panelists, the NDA, and PacerPro for permitting me to do this.
Thank You To Our Sponsors
This episode of LawNext is generously made potential by our sponsors. We recognize their help and hope you’ll examine them out.
In the event you get pleasure from listening to LawNext, please depart us a assessment wherever you hearken to podcasts.
[ad_2]
Source link