[ad_1]
(picture by way of Getty)
People rock troubadour Donovan wrote a ballad concerning the fall of Atlantis that hits the bullseye of that late-Nineteen Sixties hallucinogenic whimsy. It means that the dying society despatched 12 luminaries — named after their fields of experience — departed earlier than the autumn. The names make sense within the context of that tune. However for these of us who weren’t round within the 60s, we all know Donovan’s work extra from his visitor spot on an episode of Futurama, adapting the piece for the sunken city of Atlanta.
Figuring out their destiny, the standard individuals ran away.
Ted Turner, Hank Aaron, Jeff Foxworthy,
the person who invented Coca-Cola,
the Magician,
and the opposite so-called gods of our legends.
The Magician was within the unique tune, however the joke right here is that it’s zany in a listing of in any other case actual individuals.
That scene sprang to thoughts after studying a recent opinion by Decide Maryellen Noreika of the District of Delaware, which I found via a Tweet from James Levine.
The Decide begins:
Plaintiffs Kenneth R. Talley, Janice A. Talley, and Kristina Karen Talley, continuing professional
se, filed this lawsuit in opposition to a number of relations…
Positive.
…two personal observe attorneys…
A bit attenuated, however all proper.
…a legislation agency…
Go for the deeper pocket.
…a authorized assist group…
Or the emptiest of pockets.
…two state courtroom judges…
All proper, the judges had been — nearly actually — not engaged in conspiratorial competitors with the remainder of the events, but it surely’s comprehensible how they get right here.
…two state courts…
Proper.
…and an electrician.
*Document scratch*
And she or he doesn’t! No clarification in any respect. However digging into the criticism, it’s revealed that the electrician in query is the CEO of the native utility and he’s roped into this Bleak Home litigation — which spans a number of instances — as a result of the electrical firm turned off the juice after being directed to take action by the member of the family defendants who had prevailed in a previous motion over the possession of the property.
However the underlying dispute is a tragic one. The aged plaintiffs entered a deal that gave their daughter and son-in-law a stake within the property and, at this level, the youthful technology feels the plaintiffs want to maneuver right into a nursing residence. The plaintiffs allege that the younger ones try to swipe the property and pocket the cash. That the plaintiffs’ different grownup daughter sides together with her mother and father solely accentuates the sharp divide at play on this household dispute.
Regardless, it’s not the fault of the electrician.
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Regulation and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Be at liberty to email any ideas, questions, or feedback. Observe him on Twitter when you’re keen on legislation, politics, and a wholesome dose of school sports activities information. Joe additionally serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.
[ad_2]
Source link
